Baltimore Speeding Detection
Speeding offenses are relatively common. Baltimore speed detection is an instrumental part of deciding who gets ticketed with a speeding offense and who does not. Some tools or tactics that law enforcement officers use to tell if a person is speeding include radar, laser, and pacing. However, there are certain speeding tools that are sometimes more effective than others. If you want to know more about speed detection and how to challenge a speeding offense, speak with a knowledgeable speeding lawyer that could help.
Tools Used to Detect Speeding
The traffic radar tools used for Baltimore speeding detection are radar and laser. Laser is not a type of radar. It is another way to detect speeding. Even if the radar is working, a person could use the fact that maybe there was wind or it was raining to argue against it. To prove that they were recording the speed of a particular vehicle, the officer could use radar or laser. They would have to make sure that it was properly functioning inside of their car at the time they were certified to use it.
Potential Issues with Radar Guns
There are issues with traffic radar instrument that could come up in speeding cases like if a driver was traveling close to another driver and law enforcement got the speed of the wrong vehicle. Another situation that could result in inaccuracies is inclement weather, like rain which can interfere with readings. However, these arguments usually do not work, especially if the officer show ups. It gets very tricky if they have all of the proper documentation with them and everything was working the way that it was supposed to work. The standard of proof is low, which is why mitigating information is a better line of defense. Some of the possible defenses to a radar gun reading in court are it was raining, it was snowing, and it was windy. If they got the person and the radar is working properly, there is nothing to say that is not weather related.
Pacing as a Speed Detection Tool
Pacing is defined as obtaining the speed of an object, which would be the car, by staying behind it long enough to gauge the speed based upon the speed in which the officer has to drive. It refers to when an officer gets behind a person, follows them for an extended amount of time, and figures out their speed based upon the speed that the officer has been going behind the person. Pacing is admissible evidence of speeding. It is easy to attack because the speed has to be determined by external things. Pacing is only effective if the officer is in a straight line, there are no hills, and there are no curves in the road.
Issues Regarding Pacing in Baltimore
Some issues regarding pacing in speeding cases are based on what the officer says. Since there is no finite instrument that tracks it, pacing comes down to what the officer said happened based upon the officer following the person, and one has to figure out how much weight that gets.
A defense regarding the inaccuracy of pacing in speeding cases would be discussing the flatness or hilliness of a surface. Pacing works best when there is a flat surface. If there is no flat surface, it is difficult to ascertain a speed. The person has to be on a straight line or it does not work well. If an individual wants to know more about potential issues with pacing and other methods of Baltimore speeding detection, they should consult a capable speeding attorney that could help.